Thursday, October 26, 2006

I would have helped if I understood all the questions

Having been religiuosly confused for some time - I think of myself as spiritual, rather than pious - I thought I would have a look at Beliefnet's Belief-0-matic.

It's summary of my religious proclivities is:
1. Neo-Pagan (100%)
2. Mahayana Buddhism (84%)
3. New Age (80%)
4. Unitarian Universalism (76%)
5. Reform Judaism (70%)
6. Hinduism (69%)
7. Sikhism (69%)
8. Liberal Quakers (68%)
9. New Thought (68%)
10. Scientology (67%)
11. Theravada Buddhism (65%)
12. Orthodox Judaism (55%)
13. Bah�'� Faith (52%)
14. Christian Science (Church of Christ, Scientist) (52%)
15. Jainism (52%)
16. Taoism (52%)
17. Mainline to Liberal Christian Protestants (52%)
18. Secular Humanism (45%)
19. Islam (41%)
20. Orthodox Quaker (31%)
21. Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-Day Saints (Mormons) (30%)
22. Eastern Orthodox (30%)
23. Roman Catholic (30%)
24. Mainline to Conservative Christian/Protestant (28%)
25. Nontheist (28%)
26. Jehovah's Witness (19%)
27. Seventh Day Adventist (12%)


I suspect it would be much simpler if the Belief-o-matic had a setting for Lapsed Catholic.

0 Comments:

Post a Comment

<< Home